Chinese Culture >> Chinese Society Traditions >> China Economy
By: Scott Pearson
IT’S NO LONGER NEWS THAT CHINA IS BECOMING A MAJOR player on
the world economic scene. Yet, as we’ve noted in past editions, investing in
China is fraught with uncertainty, due to a still un-free political situation,
and insecure property rights. Despite our current lack of interest in Chinese
stocks, China’s renaissance clearly has implications for investor decisions
worldwide, simply due to its market’s enormous size.
Recently, China’s newfound economic strength has become fodder for political
electioneering, and talk of protectionism is once again rearing its ugly head.
Candidates are falling over each other to see who can blame the Chinese more
effectively than their opponents. Of course, our readers recognize such ranting
as nothing more than political gamesmanship. Nonetheless, all efforts to “save
jobs” at the expense of free trade can only be dangerous to the US economy.
Looking back in history, identical rhetoric led to trade barriers, and the Great
Depression.
For the moment, the greater issue may be what the future holds for China, and
what impact that may have globally. The key to the future centers on China’s
currency and their banking system. Trade with the US, while important, is truly
a secondary issue. So far, every story in the press involving China’s economy
seems to focus on trade issues, business growth, and cheap labor. Those are
interesting. But an issue that is getting little or no press dwarfs them.
China has two overwhelmingly significant flaws in its economic structure that
must converge in the relatively near future to cause a devastating collapse.
When that happens, politicians and reporters who have focused on trade issues
will look silly at best. Only recently have we begun to see unfocused stories
about China’s economic bubble. They cite skyrocketing real estate prices, and
over-investment in specific industries such as automotive or aluminum, but they
miss the bigger picture. Blame is cast upon Chinese peoples’ penchant for
gambling, as though it is the citizens who have brought this upon themselves.
As usual, we know to look to the government for most of the fault. China’s
financial system is a relic from the past: a dinosaur from the days before
competition entered the economy. The nation’s financial system primarily
comprises four government-owned banks, which may be privatized in the near
future. Thus far, these institutions have been shielded from competition and
guaranteed by the government. Those who remember the savings & loan fiasco here
know that thrusting such incompetent institutions into a competitive world is
disastrous. Long overdue for reform and utterly unprepared for the pressures of
competition, the problem with China’s financial system doesn’t end there.
China’s economy has grown impressively over the past decade but much of that
growth has resulted from tricks played by the government related to its currency
and exchange rates. Over the past decade, the Chinese government has carefully
“managed” exchange rates in such a way to devalue its own currency. This has
made Chinese goods unnaturally cheaper for foreign currency holders,
simultaneously impoverishing segments of the Chinese population.
To accomplish this valuation, China has had to hold vast sums of dollars, yen,
and other currencies, instead of exchanging them for yuan. This leaves other
countries holding their yuan, and causes their value to fall. The falling yuan
makes Chinese trade goods more attractive to the rest of the world, but the
citizens suffer in the short-term, due to their weak currency. We hear that the
“new” administration in China (which is directly related to the “old”
administration) has an interest in seeking a more responsible balance of
payments and reducing inflation, but we find this unimpressive. Until actions
follow the talk, there is little evidence that any real change will develop.
The combination of currency disruption and a weak banking system is a recipe for
near-sure collapse. This leads us to recommend against the rush to Chinese
stocks. However, the bigger question is what impact this collapse will have on
the world economy. It is difficult to determine how devastating the
repercussions would be, but suffice to say, it won’t be good. We’d imagine that
stable economies will hold up best, but the very size of China’s economy would
likely affect everyone. On the other hand, due to the nation’s relative
isolation, it is possible that problems will be somewhat muted. The greatest
threat would normally be a trade disruption. We might see some price increases
in Chinese-produced goods, but the impact on the U.S. economy or those of other
developed economies would not seem to be incredibly susceptible.
The greater fear may be that when China runs into trouble, it will start
spending all those dollars they’ve been holding. The result may be further
pushes toward inflation in the US, an outcome we’ve already predicted. In these
days of rabid spending, and increasing debt, an inflation rate that pushes
interest rates higher cannot be good. These concerns are not immediate, but a
long-term investment plan requires some foresight.
Despite our concerns about the longer term, we are still quite confident that
the economy, and hence the market, will perform relatively well through the
elections in November. As a result, we strongly recommend making the best of it,
as the longer-term outlook is uncertain. Perhaps when November comes, we will
have a clearer view of the future, but for now, investing for the present is all
that can be done.
To send comments or to learn more about Scott Pearson's Investment Management
Services, visit http://www.valueview.net
About the Author
Scott Pearson is an investment advisor, writer, editor, instructor, and business leader. As President and Chief Investment Officer of Value View Financial Corp., he offers investment management services to a wide variety of clients. His own newsletter, Investor's Value View, is distributed worldwide and provides general money tips and investment advice to readers both internationally, and in the U.S